<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MyPhotoSucks</title>
        <link>http://myphotosucks.com/</link>
        <description>It&apos;s not the camera, it&apos;s how you use it!</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:46:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Captioning Digital Photos</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Ken writes,</p>

<blockquote>"What program or programs are recommended for captioning digital photos? I want to be able to choose the location of the caption, the font, and the colour of the text."</blockquote>

<p>Most photo editing packages allow you to add text to your images.  I seldom add captions to photos (and SmugMug automatically watermarks my uploaded images for me there), but when I do I usually just add a text layer in Adobe Photoshop.  I just checked Photoshop Elements 6, and it supports text layers as well.  Just click on the "T" in the toolbar, click on the image,and it will create the layer for you.</p>

<p>Many companies have downloadable trial versions online.  For example, you can download <a href="http://www.adobe.com/downloads/">Adobe Photoshop Elements 6 here</a> and see if it meets your needs.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/05/captioning-digital-photos.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/05/captioning-digital-photos.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Software</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:46:46 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Depth of Field -- Example</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>For a good depth of field example, <a href="http://www.dooce.com/daily-chuck/2008/05/23/coppertop">check out this image on Dooce's blog</a>.&nbsp; Note that the battery on top of the nose is in sharp focus, the one at the back of the head isn't, and the wall is pleasantly blurred.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/05/depth-of-field-example.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/05/depth-of-field-example.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technique</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tips</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:07:49 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Depth of Field</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>In photography, depth of field (DOF) refers to the range of distances from the camera that appear to be in focus.  A lens can only focus at one distance.  However, the sharpness as one moves closer or farther away from that distance diminishes gradually and within a certain range nobody notices it.  </p>

<p>Perhaps you want to take a photo of a friend standing in front of another object.  If you have a narrow (or short) DOF, your friend may be in focus while the foreground and background appear out of focus.  At the other extreme, a wide (or long) DOF could result in the entire image appearing to be in focus.</p>

<p>There's a good example of effective DOF control <a href="http://www.dooce.com/daily-chuck/2008/05/23/coppertop">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/05/depth-of-field.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/05/depth-of-field.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technique</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tips</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:18:03 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Cheap Flash for Backgrounds</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Jim wrote to ask, </p>

<blockquote>"Eric you spoke of small cheap flashes a while ago would you have a model number I could search for. I am looking for something to light behind my subject triggered by an optical trigger."</blockquote>

<p>While the best solution to light a background is a pair of strobes, you can often get away with a basic flash and trigger to light a small area.  Just about any flash will do, although you'll need to play with the output level  and/or distance to the background to get what you need.  If you're close to the background a diffuser might come in handy -- you can buy one or make one out of translucent fabric or plastic.</p>

<p>If you're looking for something cheap I'd try your local photo store and see what they have laying around.  You can also talk to anyone who has upgraded to a digital SLR and bought a new flash.  If you have to order off the net, <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/101640-REG/Vivitar_231556_2800_Auto_Flash.html">check this out.</a></p>

<p>And, as always, leave me a comment and let me know how it goes!</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/01/cheap-flash-for-backgrounds.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/01/cheap-flash-for-backgrounds.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accessories</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:44:38 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>VueScan</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Does the software that came with your scanner suck?  Is your expensive Nikon film scanner sitting on the shelf because you bought a new computer or upgraded to the latest Windows operating system only to find out that Nikon is still in the dark ages?<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>If so, check out <a href="http://www.hamrick.com/">VueScan</a> by Hamrick Software.  It supports 750 flatbed and film scanners, you can try before you buy, and email is answered by Ed Hamrick himself.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Among other things, VueScan includes drivers to handle scanners that have been abandoned by the manufacturer, and it works on Windows (including Vista-64), Mac OS, and Linux.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>You can read more about why Ed Hamrick is my hero <a href="http://jacksch.com/2008/01/ed-hamrick.html">here</a>.</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/01/vuescan.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/01/vuescan.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:10:06 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>55-200mm or 70-300mm?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Nancy writes,<div><br /><div><blockquote>"For a complete amateur like myself, who just really really really likes to take a lot of photos...which lens? Nikkor 55-200 VR or the Nikkor 70-300 VR ED.  I currently have the 18-70 which came with my D80. My husband bought me the 55-200 but now he wants to change it to the 70-300 and I am not so sure.”</blockquote>

My first question would be “What are you going to use it for?”  Neither are wide enough to be your “main” lens.  If you’re buying a lens specifically for nature, the zoo, etc., the 70-300 is the better choice of those two. 
</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>However, if you’re heading out on a family vacation, I think you need to be honest with yourself about whether you want to carry more than one lens.  If you buy either and end up leaving it in the car or hotel, you may not get your money’s worth.  </div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/01/55200mm-or-70300mm.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2008/01/55200mm-or-70300mm.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Lenses</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:02:13 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Nikon Digitutor</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Nikon now has tutorials online for many of their cameras, including DSLRs.  You can find them at: 
<a href="http://www.nikondigitutor.com/index_eng.html"></a><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><a href="http://www.nikondigitutor.com/index_eng.html">http://www.nikondigitutor.com/index_eng.html</a></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/12/nikon-digitutor.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/12/nikon-digitutor.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:14:32 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Canon G9</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Rebecca wrote, <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">"I'm looking for a good point and shoot camera.  What do you think of the new Canon G9?"</blockquote><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /><div>The G9 specs look impressive, and Canon has added back a few of the features that I thought were missing when I reviewed the G7 for Monitor Magazine.  I've been trying to review the G9 for a few months, but unfortunately Canon's Canadian PR rep hasn't been able to send me a loaner yet, so the best I can say is that it looks promising.</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/11/canon-g9.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/11/canon-g9.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cameras</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:20:11 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Choosing a Digital Camera</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA">Before we begin, it’s important to
understand that almost everything about photography involves compromise, and
nowhere is that more evident than when choosing a digital camera.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Like any other tool, different cameras
are best for different people and different kinds of photography.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>The goal of this article is to help you
choose the best camera for you.</span></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/11/choosing-a-digital-camera.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/11/choosing-a-digital-camera.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cameras</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tips</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:44:50 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Basic Workflow</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Fay writes,</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>"<font size="2">Please advise best sequence for working with a digital image, download from camers and proceeding to -- 1. Change PPI 2. Crop 3. Resize 4. Sharpen, Contrast, etc."</font></p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">Also, apologies to Trevor who wrote with a similar question while I was redesigning the site,</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>"What is your typical work flow with regards to editing photos?"</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">These are great questions because, depending on what software you use, performing these steps in the wrong order can make your life more difficult and cost you a lot of time. To begin, let's divide our post-processing into three stages that I'll call acquisition, editing, and output.</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/10/basic-workflow-sequence.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/10/basic-workflow-sequence.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Workflow</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:12:54 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Autofocus and group shots</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>A reader writes,</p><blockquote><p>On recent vacation, I really did take many terrific shots, but a bummer being a group shot of four kids against some rocks at the beach. The colour and lighting are fine, but three kids are in crystal clear focus and the fourth, blurry.<br /> </p></blockquote><p>There are a few things that could cause that problem.&nbsp; Autofocus isn't magic, and can't read your mind, so it sometimes ends up focusing on something other than what you want.&nbsp; Autofocus mechanisms look for a straight line, so, for example, if a person is standing in front of a fence, it's not unusual for the camera to autofocus on the fence rather than the person. Digital SLRs often have multiple autofocus modes, and it is critical that you understand the characteristics of the mode you're using.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/08/autofocus-and-group-shots.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/08/autofocus-and-group-shots.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tips</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:07:24 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Church wedding with a Nikon D-80</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Nancy’s going to be shooting a wedding inside a small church and wrote to ask what flash she should use for her Nikon D-80.</p>

<p>Nikon has several external flashes, but for most people I recommend the SB-600.&nbsp; The SB-800 does provide a bit more range and some other features for people using multiple-flash setups, but most people don’t use those features and the additional range is not worth the higher price tag.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/08/church-wedding-with-a-nikon-d8.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/08/church-wedding-with-a-nikon-d8.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accessories</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tips</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:36:54 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Canon pays attention!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The main complaint I had about the Canon G7 is that it didn't support shooting RAW.&nbsp; Apparently Canon was listening.&nbsp; According to their <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/html/templatedata/pressrelease/20070820_g9.html">recent announcement</a>, they have reintroduced RAW mode in the G9.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/08/canon-pays-attention.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/08/canon-pays-attention.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cameras</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:00:02 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Protective filters and digital cameras</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Nancy writes,</p><blockquote><p>When I told you I rec'd a Nikon D80, you recommended a protective lens to me. My husband bought:</p>

<p>Tamron 67mm UV Haze Filter</p>

<p>Will this lens work as you recommended?</p></blockquote><p>It should do the job to protect your lens, but it might not be your best choice.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/07/protective-filters-and-digital.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/07/protective-filters-and-digital.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Accessories</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:14:03 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A matter of perspective</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Gabrielle posted a question a while back, and in summary, she wanted to know why an image she found on the net &quot;sort of comes towards you&quot;.

</p>

<p>You can find the image online at <a href="http://www.pbase.com/image/75217819">http://www.pbase.com/image/75217819</a>

</p>

<p>I think the image is strong due to the prominence of the foreground and the lines that lead the viewer's eye toward the horizon.&nbsp; The fact that some of the lines converge seem to add to the impact. From a technical point of view, I think the wide angle lens, sharp interesting foreground, and horizon at the upper thirds line also contributes to this wonderful image.

</p>

<p>If there are any artists reading that can give us some more insight, please do leave a comment with your thoughts!

</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/06/a-matter-of-perspective.html</link>
            <guid>http://myphotosucks.com/2007/06/a-matter-of-perspective.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category"><![CDATA[Q&amp;A]]></category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
